Contact

Please e-mail the American Small Business League (ASBL) at brianreeder@asbl.com. Thank you.

Friday, June 15, 2007

Group argues for shielding contractors' revenue, employee counts

This article came out today and discusses access to data fields on the Central Contractor Registration. In a comment to the Small Business Administration, responding to a FOIA request to have 44 items removed from the exempt list of CCR fields; the Professional Services Council, an Arlington, Va., group representing government service contractors annual revenue opposed the removal of exempt status and promoted the addition of several other fields including a company's number of employees and a company-specific identification code.

The removal of such fields would make it harder than it already is to determine which companies in the CCR are small and furthermore, which large companies are obtaining small business contracts. We promote the publishing of a majority of the exempt fields including average revenue, number of employee statistics and NAICS codes along with additional fields that would designate status as a parent company or a subsidiary and to which companies.

Here is the link to the article:

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0607/061407m1.htm

Thursday, June 14, 2007

New SBA Policy Lets Miscoded Small Business Contracts Continue Until 2012

Petaluma, Calif.- On June 30th a new Small Business Administration policy is set to take effect that has outraged small business owners across the country. The new SBA five-year re-certification/grandfathering policy will allow the SBA to include billions of dollars in federal contracts to Fortune 1000 firms towards the federal government’s 23 percent small business contracting goal until the year 2012.

As early as 2002, federal investigations began to find that the SBA had reported contracts to hundreds of Fortune 1000 firms as small business awards. Two investigations by the SBA Office of Advocacy and the SBA Office of Inspector General found in many cases large businesses had received federal small business contracts fraudulently. (http://www.asbl.com/documents/05-16.pdf)

The SBA responded to the charges by saying the contracts to the large businesses had been "miscoded" as small business contracts. (http://www.asbl.com/showmedia.php?id=393) The new five-year re-certification/grandfathering policy will allow the SBA to continue to include the "miscoded" small business contracts to Fortune 1000 firms in their small business contracting statistics until the year 2012.

Beginning in 2003, the Office of Federal Procurement policy and the SBA Office of Inspector General called for a plan to remove Fortune 1000 firms and other large businesses from the government's small business contracting programs. (http://www.washingtontechnology.com/print/17_22/20148-1.html) The SBA never implemented the policies, and they continued to include billions of dollars in contracts to Fortune 1000 firms and other large business in the United States and Europe towards the government's 23 percent small business goal.
SBA critics point out that if the new five-year re-certification/grandfathering policy is allowed to stand, legitimate small business could lose between $200 and $300 billion in federal small business contracts over the next five years.

Small business owners and advocates were hoping Congress would step in and pass legislation to stop the SBA policy from taking effect. To date, no legislation has been passed to stop the SBA policy or halt the flow of federal small business contracts to large businesses.

###

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

ASBL - Small Businesses Fight For the Removal of All Fortune 1000 Corporations from Small Business Contracting

We have been making dramatic progress in recent weeks towards the removal of Fortune 1000 corporations and their subsidiaries from America's small business contracting program, but we need to keep pressing the senate to include a provision in the Senate modification of H.R. 1873 that would call for the removal of all Fortune 1000 corporations from federal small business contracting. Our members and their employees have been active on the phones calling their senators, congressmen and the members of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, but we need more people to join in the effort. We need everyone that is concerned about the diversion of federal small business contracts, including you, to help us out and contact their senators today. Below you will find some links to the senate and congressional directories as well as a letter template that you can use to email them. Its time to ban together; we need your help.

Links

Senate: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Congress: http://www.uschamber.com/chambers/directory/default

Sample Letter

Dear_____,

As an owner/employee of a small business I am very concerned about H.R. 1873, the Small Business Fairness In Contracting Act. The bill does not contain a provision that calls for the removal of all Fortune 1000 corporations and other large companies from the federal database of small businesses. I am asking that you propose and/or support a provision in the Senate modification of H.R. 1873 that would preclude Fortune 1000 corporations and other large businesses from receiving federal small business contract awards. I am also asking you to propose and/or support a provision that would prevent federal prime contractors and the Small Business Administration from awarding small business awards to large businesses and counting those awards toward the federal government's 23 percent small business procurement goal. The diversion of federal small business contracts has been covered by every major television network and newspaper in America and I believe it is time for Congress to take actions to ensure that federal small business contracts and subcontracts go to legitimate small businesses. We appreciate your help and consideration.

Sincerely,

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Owners slip through the small business loophole

Here is an interesting article from Massachusetts that sheds light into small business issues in Senator John Kerry's state. As you know Senator Kerry is the chair of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Despite evidence of the diversion of federal small business contracts to Fortune 1000 corporations through fraud, abuse, loopholes, and a lack of oversight, Senator Kerry has yet to hold oversight hearings in his committee.

Owners slip through the small business loophole
http://www.dailynewstribune.com/homepage/x1017306418